Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-96676-apmail-lucene-dev-archive=lucene.apache.org@lucene.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CAD379AA7
	for <apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Mon, 23 Apr 2012 19:25:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 85978 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2012 19:25:31 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org
Received: (qmail 85915 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2012 19:25:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@lucene.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@lucene.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.lucene.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org
Received: (qmail 85908 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2012 19:25:31 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 19:25:31 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dawid.weiss@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.213.176 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.213.176] (HELO mail-yx0-f176.google.com)
 (209.85.213.176)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 19:25:25 +0000
Received: by yenl3 with SMTP id l3so8214034yen.35
        for <dev@lucene.apache.org>; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:25:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        bh=d4HNi4HcUjqx/FvOcSKrWbpBPJuCrZuKjyzLv6uLpFk=;
        b=H0ZylKPB5WAiyT5t5gZlSrRTNkD2Pd3vz/h52ulQmoQT6AueOPENlB46yQ4yEyK+hn
         81I+WQPLHIvw55DY0LDwJPmpByYsfdhVG2JoP0+SfolkGqPAcpr21YJK32JNy/4y8rzk
         5OGqQvakLOXQT3eS/Ql7gFRYt87NdhgrFCn15qaBYph6joiFSgesOKlchBhaHjos4SmT
         k1DYLLp9QaGqmRuyiWkXnrc77yfnO7CH6tn+bLvKZcmZ/dwmpyxIwgsld7BXfJs1A/3S
         tD9q3+eUe0HA+9RSvQ/h6SORi2Vh1y05Rqv7/ozhOiCHJ237x9emN9wA+92zzWCmHcis
         GUYQ==
Received: by 10.50.153.132 with SMTP id vg4mr7532240igb.2.1335209104253; Mon,
 23 Apr 2012 12:25:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: dawid.weiss@gmail.com
Received: by 10.42.117.199 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:24:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAOdYfZWD5v=zWgWYA2Po0NmGW86-jO-c2anQAFJaecJrwsJp0A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1335150876872-3931419.post@n3.nabble.com>
 <CAM21Rt8mYJHnxft=o5XCKDJaKA5qmV4q0sGh6DNiJSHKoN4_qA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAL8PwkZH-jtS3QEjE0u_72PttKTPcMCBZU3FbHkGyqR_-JFHAg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOdYfZUgV_LxkqqE=7uMxBuXjezaYrx=9rRENkdH6fQEJ3yC3Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOdYfZW3=MkXXDp9sDU5084sy4agfpbfLq=-SkdQ9YJAHCGRDA@mail.gmail.com>
 <15BE0231-DF58-4838-9903-5475AF417033@mitre.org>
 <CAOdYfZVmytM+ma1wDEZFqMEYyPFMWkgPuu8Wd9rZiAJDjo2AtA@mail.gmail.com>
 <9581EF2F-0F45-40A1-942E-FD074779A353@mitre.org>
 <CAOdYfZWXuqcSE2ocis+GFb1XVHCPqYb3w1=OY_pewqFtWpoYQA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAM21Rt-U_DKeJrTO-P6y9UivZib9B+DbSAyKi10mLE9fwCXOKA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOdYfZWkGMw_9KnapOhjgQ6_G6RaFjHb_WRdHH8asTHRNKh75g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAM21Rt9pHpUPXDMQx3Kj11n8gxj1ROm+jiWJRkrUDG7pTpx7WA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOdYfZWD5v=zWgWYA2Po0NmGW86-jO-c2anQAFJaecJrwsJp0A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dawid Weiss <dawid.weiss@cs.put.poznan.pl>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 21:24:44 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: CnM9NccY4OoU1yhptgMMvPmSX3g
Message-ID: 
 <CAM21Rt9Ext5iLQz+RWScQ8NcSckZF2LTNJYuKE3CjXiUF8yK7w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Ant version for building Solr
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Yep, sure. You don't need a property, btw., there is a condition for that --

    <antversion atleast="1.8.2" />

wrap it into a fail and you're set.

D.

On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Robert Muir <rcmuir@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Dawid Weiss
> <dawid.weiss@cs.put.poznan.pl> wrote:
>
>> Definitely not the early ones because they were buggy. 1.8.3 seems
>> relatively fresh (February 29th, 2012), so I'd say 1.8.2 (2010-12-20)?
>> This is a long delay from 1.8.2 to 1.8.3... just peeked at the rel.
>> notes and there are issues that could affect us:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48789
>>
>> I also don't object to just saying 1.8.3 is the minimum required
>> version. It's the trunk after all -- it'll be a month or two (ehm)
>> before it is released so 1.8.3 will be a de-facto standard?
>>
>
> Well, for whatever version we require, i actually think if there were
> serious bugs in 1.8.x, we should consider enforcing that we actually
> have that minimal version (ant exposes a property for that). I think
> its better to say 'you have the wrong version of ant, its not gonna
> work' than to give a strange permgen/oom/wrong
> packaging/miscompile/... of course if the bugs only affect some
> special thing (particularly an undocumented task like a hudson one),
> then maybe we don't need to go that far.
>
>
>
> --
> lucidimagination.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org