Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7766D9FD1 for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 16:56:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 47460 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2012 16:56:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 47241 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2012 16:56:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 47232 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2012 16:56:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 16:56:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-wg0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 16:56:26 +0000 Received: by wgbdq10 with SMTP id dq10so1003830wgb.5 for ; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 09:56:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=uXs5Cbzne5531JjaKJkFgC0Gn9BEZ0zV2q+EYbDX/hk=; b=Cj9b4uJsCyErbW8tWTirAd02LaQ+gzplYxba/26HMw+T2jBTZ0+b5x6duKWQ25URYI tdl3Z+kKxPwINDXjesOFE6j6RR5Q4ZB7ryaTT536QQ7dY30iaxjqaBddn9dKDvQLrHxw ZDRkSUrdrcNRz5jVj4TR6NYZvwG0M7WhnCntCzQKoYXie5U9rW12ntw2NaHpKqv/pA1O OZ2QStDpxxf4UkL3NARh6Lg7y15cbm1TXHg4MhRlKL+jjWuE2EM5cxcd1KrQY/byMkB0 +oztKGnAomHhSjmymzlLDZxWS3Ek1kq7JCsjDvCluuoUht1U+WipqBQDuz69Y6usQ7rZ D9jg== Received: by 10.180.80.104 with SMTP id q8mr6584532wix.14.1333644960049; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 09:56:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.133.158 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 09:55:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Michael McCandless Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 12:55:39 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Merge IO throttling To: dev@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm3AqsSI4BNt+IDEfFdK+i5U3YVbpcHjgj7l8sSpuwSJ+dWTjwpBm/rEZBHX+3ohDtkRJk1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Yes, in trunk: FSDirectory.setMaxMergeWriteMBPerSec. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Jason Rutherglen wrote: > Has any type of IO rate limiting been implemented for merges? > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org