Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5B85E998F for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 22:05:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22276 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2012 22:05:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 22059 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2012 22:05:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 22052 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2012 22:05:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 22:05:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of markrmiller@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.47] (HELO mail-qa0-f47.google.com) (209.85.216.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 22:05:31 +0000 Received: by qabg1 with SMTP id g1so68497qab.6 for ; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 15:05:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=9Ov4cfx/OG+cOAGSjHRzdziUx/8kcQkcRyx/C2WFB3E=; b=qrwOgNWMaC+4QKESZMl1mjkOxA/BkYTOm4UD5AUaR3pJbJuYMonLy0eQ2iLuEK4HFC C+BgYmVzcOWgyZ67XL03cvP2qS7PEZGUPoZnGpytH5lL9NP61VHtofni7jtr2bA5QlRb IKrS088FVJQYc6DC8Uf2Z1eCs+6u+r7jR56LIV4l7amlXTjmhEWIgF04UBHDrrWbcF73 zAjiaOIYPWxz4fKwzjNG+aQPpmYHvfgRr8XU9Ooj9LZry0VMjCH51DxAKuyPn/N4G0tC DumirKRiucbbwFRDaRKETUM0/p63aWIsUiq4B3QVZZ9TM/QwMmrGXVTMERQPB+fy+hax 35dw== Received: by 10.224.59.82 with SMTP id k18mr6481042qah.54.1333663510838; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 15:05:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.201] (ool-457bed02.dyn.optonline.net. [69.123.237.2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j17sm8021948qaj.9.2012.04.05.15.05.09 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 05 Apr 2012 15:05:09 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) Subject: Re: VOTE: Lucene/Solr 3.6 From: Mark Miller In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 18:05:07 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <461F249E-EFA8-40F2-82C2-9340C5BAF121@mitre.org> To: dev@lucene.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Apr 5, 2012, at 5:45 PM, Robert Muir wrote: > Its too late to discuss this issue for 3.6 +1. We don't even know *what* will end up happening on trunk until 4 is = released. Let's not get all bent out of shape here when we might = undeprecate it and then just remove it later anyway. I believe there is = a wiki release errata type page that we can use to clarify if we need = to. Otherwise the worst that happens is that some people move to using = the params rather than the xml files - no big deal. If we end up = removing it, they are good. If we don't, they are still good. This is a = tiny issue that I don't believe will change any of the votes already = given. - Mark Miller lucidimagination.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org