Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7FCA19F19 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:53:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6419 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2012 17:53:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 6350 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2012 17:53:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 6318 invoked by uid 99); 24 Apr 2012 17:53:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:53:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:53:55 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8629B40D82E for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:53:35 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:53:35 +0000 (UTC) From: "Steven Rowe (JIRA)" To: dev@lucene.apache.org Message-ID: <551974659.10547.1335290015550.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1895788472.9710.1335276815214.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3405) maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260754#comment-13260754 ] Steven Rowe commented on SOLR-3405: ----------------------------------- So under this proposal, which of these would NOT be published on maven central?: * solr-core-X.Y.Z.jar * solr-test-framework-X.Y.Z.jar * solr--X.Y.Z.jar If I understand properly, under this proposal, the Solr war would be published on maven central, but several maven proponents have said that that is not useful. By contrast, I believe there are people who currently depend on solr-core and solr-test-framework via Maven. For solrj, to make maven artifacts consistent with the binary distribution, I think the POM should mark as optional those dependencies that don't ship with the binary distribution (that may already be the case, I haven't checked). > maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-3405 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Task > Components: Build > Reporter: Robert Muir > Fix For: 4.0 > > > Lets take the commons-csv scenario: > * apache-solr-3.5.0 binary distribution contains no actual commons-csv.jar anywhere, > in fact it contains no third party jars (the stuff present in solr/lib) at all. > * binary distribution contains only the jars necessary for *solrj* and *contrib plugins*, and a solr.war > I think the maven artifacts should match whats in the binary release (no third party jars > inside the .war are "exposed", we just publish the .war itself). This exposes a lot less surface area. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org