Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4E0389267 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:27:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4456 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2012 15:27:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 4387 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2012 15:27:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 4378 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2012 15:27:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:27:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:27:39 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 536B5367B06 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:27:18 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:27:18 +0000 (UTC) From: "Dawid Weiss (Commented) (JIRA)" To: dev@lucene.apache.org Message-ID: <1996480359.17506.1334244438343.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <1680645009.14961.1334182756796.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3972) Improve AllGroupsCollector implementations MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3972?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13252486#comment-13252486 ] Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-3972: ------------------------------------- Hmmm... it's not collisions then, it was worth a try. I still find the difference puzzling -- I can't justify your version being 3x faster. Curious what it might be. bq. But we know a lot about docids, and extra hashing should just lead to an average-case slowdown. Ok. > Improve AllGroupsCollector implementations > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: LUCENE-3972 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3972 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: modules/grouping > Reporter: Martijn van Groningen > Attachments: LUCENE-3972.patch, LUCENE-3972.patch > > > I think that the performance of TermAllGroupsCollectorm, DVAllGroupsCollector.BR and DVAllGroupsCollector.SortedBR can be improved by using BytesRefHash to store the groups instead of an ArrayList. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org