Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4062E9DDA for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:59:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46741 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2012 11:59:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 46580 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2012 11:59:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 46562 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2012 11:59:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:59:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:59:00 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F30B84127B for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:58:39 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:58:39 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uwe Schindler (Commented) (JIRA)" To: dev@lucene.apache.org Message-ID: <1921218796.9393.1334923119996.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <445245453.8987.1334910281865.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4003) FieldCacheRewriteMethod.java is in tests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13258164#comment-13258164 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-4003: --------------------------------------- I like this idea, too. I would like to move this rewrite method (a little bit refactored, using FixedBitSet instead OpenBitSet) to core, factor out the inner Filter impl to be something like MTQWrapperFilter (maybe include the code in MTQWrapperFilter and only set a boolean in ctor). The rewrite mode would then be similar to FilterRewrite, just with another boolean. We can remove FieldCacheRangeFilter.newStringRange() [or at least rewrite it to use this rewrite method], which would be elegant, too. FieldCacheTermsFilter and also the TermsFilter in contrib can go away and we should instead use the sorted terms automaton (I always forget the name, Dawid, sorry) as a new AtomatonQuery subclass. > FieldCacheRewriteMethod.java is in tests > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-4003 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4003 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: selckin > > I believe FieldCacheRewriteMethod was accidentally moved to the wrong place in r1158697 and should be src/main and not in src/test. > Or is it something that you don't want people to use? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org