lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hoss Man (Commented) (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3076) Solr should support block joins
Date Tue, 10 Apr 2012 18:21:21 GMT


Hoss Man commented on SOLR-3076:

As i said before...

bq. ...perhaps we should focus on the more user explicit, direct mapping type QParser type
approach Mikhail has already started on for now, and consider that (_schema driven implicit
block joining_) as an enhancement later? (especially since it's not clear how the indexing
side will be managed/enforced...)

what Mikhail's fleshed out here seems like a good starting point for users who are willing
to deal with this at the "low" level (similar in expertness to the "raw" QParser) , and would
be usable *today* for people who take responsibility of indexing the blocks themselves.

if/when/how we decide to drive the indexing side, we can think about how if/where/how to automagically
hook blockjoin queries into "higher" level parsers like LuceneQParser, DismaxQueryParser
> Solr should support block joins
> -------------------------------
>                 Key: SOLR-3076
>                 URL:
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
>         Attachments: SOLR-3076.patch, SOLR-3076.patch, SOLR-3076.patch, SOLR-3076.patch,
SOLR-3076.patch, bjq-vs-filters-backward-disi.patch, bjq-vs-filters-illegal-state.patch, child-bjqparser.patch,
parent-bjq-qparser.patch, parent-bjq-qparser.patch, solrconf-bjq-erschema-snippet.xml, tochild-bjq-filtered-search-fix.patch
> Lucene has the ability to do block joins, we should add it to Solr.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see:


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message