lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Robert Muir (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4007) many versioned documents could/should be in javadocs instead.
Date Sat, 21 Apr 2012 23:22:33 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13258959#comment-13258959
] 

Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4007:
-------------------------------------

I think its just that one 'lucenedocs' property.
                
> many versioned documents could/should be in javadocs instead.
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-4007
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4007
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: Robert Muir
>            Assignee: Uwe Schindler
>         Attachments: LUCENE-4007.patch
>
>
> Looking at our forrested site, and trying to think about how we could move our versioned
site
> away from it, I think as a first step we should look at what really needs to be there.
> I think it easily becomes out of date and we don't have good centralized documentation
since
> stuff is split between javadocs and forrest.
> Couldn't queryparsersyntax.xml simply be in the overview/package for the queryparser?
> We could just link to that page from the forrest docs menu, then we could link to the
syntax from
> other places in the javadocs. 
> Furthermore, in that case we could link to other queryparser impls documentations (e.g.
complexphrase)
> so it would probably be more useful.
> demo/demo2.xml could just be overview for the demo contrib? currently that one is useless:
> https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-trunk/javadoc/demo/index.html
> scoring.xml could be added to the package documentation of search or similarities or
somewhere that 
> makes more sense? currently its "almost javadocs" already, except harder to validate
none of these
> links are actually out of date: my best bet is a ton of them already are!
> i'll leave fileformats.xml aside for now, but with many different codec implementations
its something
> to think about for later too.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message