lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Robert Muir (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-3887) 'ant javadocs' should fail if a package is missing a package.html
Date Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:25:38 GMT


Robert Muir updated LUCENE-3887:

    Attachment: LUCENE-3887.patch

initial patch: just hooks into lucene's 'javadocs-lint' (but also a one-liner to hook into

I added an option for 'level' of checking, currently its at 'package'. the idea is we fix
those... move to 'class'.... then 'method'....
> 'ant javadocs' should fail if a package is missing a package.html
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: LUCENE-3887
>                 URL:
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: general/build
>            Reporter: Robert Muir
>         Attachments: LUCENE-3887.patch, LUCENE-3887.patch, LUCENE-3887.patch
> While reviewing the javadocs I noticed many packages are missing a basic package.html.
> For 3.x I committed some package.html files where they were missing (I will port forward
to trunk).
> I think all packages should have this... really all public/protected classes/methods/constants,
> but this would be a good step.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see:


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message