lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Uwe Schindler" <...@thetaphi.de>
Subject RE: VOTE: Lucene/Solr 3.6
Date Fri, 06 Apr 2012 11:39:21 GMT
I agree. I would have build only the javadocs with java 7, the rest with Java 5.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcmuir@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 06, 2012 1:36 PM
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: VOTE: Lucene/Solr 3.6
> 
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 6:35 AM, Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de> wrote:
> 
> > - Binary Javadocs still Geocities-like, it's no problem, but was it not planned
to
> use Java 7? - It's of course fine!
> >
> 
> Right: as i proposed originally on the list, this would be something special I
> would do for the website *only*.
> 
> In my opinion its too risky to do this in the build we ship, because it would mean
> i would have to compile with java7 and java5 bootstrap
> classpath: of course in theory that shoudl all work, but i feel much more
> comfortable building the release with an actual java 5 compiler.
> 
> --
> lucidimagination.com
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional
> commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message