Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1659B934F for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 19:39:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77395 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2012 19:39:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 77333 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2012 19:39:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 77326 invoked by uid 99); 6 Mar 2012 19:39:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 19:39:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.160.176] (HELO mail-gy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.160.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 19:39:35 +0000 Received: by ghbz10 with SMTP id z10so3104423ghb.35 for ; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 11:39:14 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of hossman_lucene@fucit.org designates 10.60.10.40 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.60.10.40; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of hossman_lucene@fucit.org designates 10.60.10.40 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=hossman_lucene@fucit.org Received: from mr.google.com ([10.60.10.40]) by 10.60.10.40 with SMTP id f8mr10422897oeb.14.1331062754539 (num_hops = 1); Tue, 06 Mar 2012 11:39:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.10.40 with SMTP id f8mr9162751oeb.14.1331062754490; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 11:39:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from bester.local ([65.78.136.75]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g4sm793972oeg.5.2012.03.06.11.39.11 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 06 Mar 2012 11:39:12 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 11:39:09 -0800 (PST) From: Chris Hostetter To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: ideas for alphas/betas? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlnT/LW3VioMj7rHq+vYsnao38NVw1ZnYrixmKMqXOHSkYA53YCPe3nZYK/0t2SO1X+GbDh X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org : I was thinking that in order to actually get people to use and test : these things, we should try to make them more than just nightly : builds. agreed ... your bug criteria below makes sense, and i think it would be help promote testing & adoption if we treated the alpha/beta release(s) as *true* releases - voted on and published to the mirrors. : Alpha: : We won't change the index format unless necessary to fix a bug : : Beta: : We won't change public apis or configuration files unless necessary : to fix a bug -Hoss --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org