Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8C89B9104 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 13:49:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84421 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2012 13:49:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 84376 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2012 13:49:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 84367 invoked by uid 99); 16 Mar 2012 13:49:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 13:49:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of erickerickson@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.176] (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.210.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 13:49:41 +0000 Received: by iagw33 with SMTP id w33so7239565iag.35 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 06:49:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=gjhD4oIMPuKvhipilGJ16VWP2DV1Aoj3z2Wb4JGfcE4=; b=snUdiD6SkxZO3lE3qnKRUwxLGU5BriXsHuMaFg+8uMheh+VdZL3MDr+cVz8KWiU/u7 4LI/iu2LhMJQHg5mdGOnaLnCsszSGVgSERUKgDCiN+hWq4RvRruCuv4cbbH6whGQI3y2 ZEiFz86f7oL9XNjioTNWyaZcRYv+ClA1RLJQ1ghlixtSuZZ4c67BOl/ub2+t/UiHwHsg uoyzFhP2nVuIl5xZ2eXFeQKDhGkHsMKYOyo+Obqbl9qoebIBmHOZRKdVkPCETYsguZMD iz3rKaw/NyzOpBuAp8iR1H0bZuIOFdvvqPzzF05jXzy9PBu+N2/oTL8IeaZnczuDZ0dY z8Eg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.179.71 with SMTP id de7mr2113311igc.73.1331905760437; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 06:49:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.43.46.137 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 06:49:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 08:49:20 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Java 1.6 EOL From: Erick Erickson To: dev@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Which just begs the question (sorry if it has been discussed before) of whether we should officially only support Solr/Lucene 4.0 under Java 1.7. Erick On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 4:04 AM, Dawid Weiss wrote: > So close! > > https://blogs.oracle.com/henrik/entry/updated_java_6_eol_date?msgid=3-6077692575 > > Dawid > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org