Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0F7D59A5E for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:16:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73274 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2012 15:16:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 73202 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2012 15:16:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 73165 invoked by uid 99); 22 Mar 2012 15:16:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:16:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:16:44 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A845340618 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:16:23 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:16:23 +0000 (UTC) From: "Robert Muir (Commented) (JIRA)" To: dev@lucene.apache.org Message-ID: <983946488.2539.1332429383176.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <118591172.2537.1332429383057.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3903) javadocs very very ugly if you generate with java7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3903?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13235628#comment-13235628 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3903: ------------------------------------- I really think we should fix this for 3.6: its not just that its ugly but it looks actually broken. > javadocs very very ugly if you generate with java7 > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-3903 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3903 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Bug > Components: general/javadocs > Affects Versions: 3.6, 4.0 > Reporter: Robert Muir > > Java7 changes its javadocs to look much nicer, but this involves different CSS styles. > Lucene overrides the CSS with stylesheet+prettify.css which is a combination of java5/6 stylesheet + google prettify: > but there are problems because java7 has totally different styles. > So if you generate javadocs with java7, its like you have no stylesheet at all. > A solution might be to make stylesheet7+prettify.css and conditionalize a property in ant based on java version. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org