Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:04:27 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Christian Moen (Commented) (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Message-ID: 
 <265537027.16901.1332759867309.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org>
In-Reply-To: 
 <493523336.12600.1332582145154.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3909) Move Kuromoji to analysis.ja and
 introduce Japanese* naming
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13238267#comment-13238267 ] 

Christian Moen commented on LUCENE-3909:
----------------------------------------

Committed revision 1305297 to {{trunk}}.  Backporting to {{branch_3x}}.
                
> Move Kuromoji to analysis.ja and introduce Japanese* naming
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-3909
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3909
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: modules/analysis
>    Affects Versions: 3.6, 4.0
>            Reporter: Christian Moen
>            Assignee: Christian Moen
>
> Lucene/Solr 3.6 and 4.0 will get out-of-the-box Japanese language support through {{KuromojiAnalyzer}}, {{KuromojiTokenizer}} and various other filters.  These filters currently live in {{org.apache.lucene.analysis.kuromoji}}.
> I'm proposing that we move Kuromoji to a new Japanese package {{org.apache.lucene.analysis.ja}} in line with how other languages are organized.  As part of this, I also think we should rename {{KuromojiAnalyzer}} to {{JapaneseAnalyzer}}, etc. to further align naming to our conventions by making it very clear that these analyzers are for Japanese.  (As much as I like the name "Kuromoji", I think "Japanese" is more fitting.)
> A potential issue I see with this that I'd like to raise and get feedback on, is that end-users in Japan and elsewhere who use lucene-gosen could have issues after an upgrade since lucene-gosen is in fact releasing its analyzers under the {{org.apache.lucene.analysis.ja}} namespace (and we'd have a name clash).
> I believe users should have the freedom to choose whichever Japanese analyzer, filter, etc. they'd like to use, and I don't want to propose a name change that just creates unnecessary problems for users, but I think the naming proposed above is most fitting for a Lucene/Solr release.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org