Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CDDDB9FC9 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 17:42:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15773 invoked by uid 500); 20 Mar 2012 17:42:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 15699 invoked by uid 500); 20 Mar 2012 17:42:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 15692 invoked by uid 99); 20 Mar 2012 17:42:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 17:42:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 17:42:01 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1966BD9BF for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 17:41:39 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 17:41:39 +0000 (UTC) From: "Christian Moen (Commented) (JIRA)" To: dev@lucene.apache.org Message-ID: <229457191.37412.1332265299991.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <685925744.33585.1332198338624.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3887) 'ant javadocs' should fail if a package is missing a package.html MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13233604#comment-13233604 ] Christian Moen commented on LUCENE-3887: ---------------------------------------- Robert, I should be careful recommending things I haven't tried, but perhaps Checkstyle (http://checkstyle.sourceforge.net/) could be useful for this. The javadoc package check described on http://checkstyle.sourceforge.net/config_javadoc.html seems to cover this sort of style check. Checkstyle also integrates with build tools so it's also possible to do some light style checking as part of the build -- either optional or integrated longer term, if we'd like that. (I'm sure there are various opinions on wether this is a good idea.) > 'ant javadocs' should fail if a package is missing a package.html > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-3887 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3887 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Task > Components: general/build > Reporter: Robert Muir > > While reviewing the javadocs I noticed many packages are missing a basic package.html. > For 3.x I committed some package.html files where they were missing (I will port forward to trunk). > I think all packages should have this... really all public/protected classes/methods/constants, > but this would be a good step. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org