Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 654729EEB for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 11:12:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86230 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2012 11:12:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 85994 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2012 11:12:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 85986 invoked by uid 99); 22 Mar 2012 11:12:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 11:12:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 11:12:42 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF88D33D894 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 11:12:22 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 11:12:22 +0000 (UTC) From: "Uwe Schindler (Issue Comment Edited) (JIRA)" To: dev@lucene.apache.org Message-ID: <1767697663.1829.1332414742785.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <465341840.11785.1331706218099.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Issue Comment Edited] (LUCENE-3867) RamUsageEstimator.NUM_BYTES_ARRAY_HEADER and other constants are incorrect MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13235502#comment-13235502 ] Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-3867 at 3/22/12 11:12 AM: ----------------------------------------------------------------- OK. All you have to remove is the if (fieldFound && useUnsafe) check and always recurse. fieldFound itsself can also be removed. was (Author: thetaphi): OK. All you have to remove is the if (fieldFound || useUnsafe) check and always recurse. fieldFound itsself can also be removed. > RamUsageEstimator.NUM_BYTES_ARRAY_HEADER and other constants are incorrect > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-3867 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3867 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Bug > Components: core/index > Reporter: Shai Erera > Assignee: Uwe Schindler > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 3.6, 4.0 > > Attachments: LUCENE-3867-3.x.patch, LUCENE-3867-compressedOops.patch, LUCENE-3867.patch, LUCENE-3867.patch, LUCENE-3867.patch, LUCENE-3867.patch, LUCENE-3867.patch, LUCENE-3867.patch, LUCENE-3867.patch, LUCENE-3867.patch, LUCENE-3867.patch, LUCENE-3867.patch, LUCENE-3867.patch, LUCENE-3867.patch, LUCENE-3867.patch, LUCENE-3867.patch, LUCENE-3867.patch, LUCENE-3867.patch, LUCENE-3867.patch > > > RamUsageEstimator.NUM_BYTES_ARRAY_HEADER is computed like that: NUM_BYTES_OBJECT_HEADER + NUM_BYTES_INT + NUM_BYTES_OBJECT_REF. The NUM_BYTES_OBJECT_REF part should not be included, at least not according to this page: http://www.javamex.com/tutorials/memory/array_memory_usage.shtml > {quote} > A single-dimension array is a single object. As expected, the array has the usual object header. However, this object head is 12 bytes to accommodate a four-byte array length. Then comes the actual array data which, as you might expect, consists of the number of elements multiplied by the number of bytes required for one element, depending on its type. The memory usage for one element is 4 bytes for an object reference ... > {quote} > While on it, I wrote a sizeOf(String) impl, and I wonder how do people feel about including such helper methods in RUE, as static, stateless, methods? It's not perfect, there's some room for improvement I'm sure, here it is: > {code} > /** > * Computes the approximate size of a String object. Note that if this object > * is also referenced by another object, you should add > * {@link RamUsageEstimator#NUM_BYTES_OBJECT_REF} to the result of this > * method. > */ > public static int sizeOf(String str) { > return 2 * str.length() + 6 // chars + additional safeness for arrays alignment > + 3 * RamUsageEstimator.NUM_BYTES_INT // String maintains 3 integers > + RamUsageEstimator.NUM_BYTES_ARRAY_HEADER // char[] array > + RamUsageEstimator.NUM_BYTES_OBJECT_HEADER; // String object > } > {code} > If people are not against it, I'd like to also add sizeOf(int[] / byte[] / long[] / double[] ... and String[]). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org