lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tommaso Teofili <tommaso.teof...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: ideas for alphas/betas?
Date Wed, 07 Mar 2012 15:42:25 GMT
2012/3/7 Robert Muir <rcmuir@gmail.com>

> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 1:42 AM, Shai Erera <serera@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I agree.
> >
> > Maybe we should also tag issues as 4.0-alpha, 4.0-beta in JIRA? For
> > 4.0-alpha we'll tag all the issues that are expected to change the index
> > format, and 4.0-beta all the issues that require API changes?
> >
>
> I have no opinion on the actual JIRA tagging, but I think Hoss has a
> good point that it would be better if we looked at alphas/betas as
> "real releases"... ideally our first alpha release would be exactly
> the same as our real 4.0 release, but we are just being realistic and
> at the same time marking some caveats so that users know its a big
> scary change.
>
> So I'm not sure we should intentionally try to delay/bucket any issues
> to alpha or beta, I think we should try to make it great from the
> start... these 'guarantees' are just to help increase adoption and
> testing.
>

+1, as also Simon was saying let's go fixing the blockers and start working
on the alpha release process.

Tommaso


>
> --
> lucidimagination.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Mime
View raw message