lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Uwe Schindler (Commented) (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3878) CheckIndex should check deleted documents too
Date Fri, 16 Mar 2012 20:59:41 GMT


Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3878:

Heavy bug fixing! That separation of liveDocs in CheckIndex is a very good idea.
I hope you are not annoyed by my vLong nitpicking...
> CheckIndex should check deleted documents too
> ---------------------------------------------
>                 Key: LUCENE-3878
>                 URL:
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Task
>    Affects Versions: 4.0
>            Reporter: Robert Muir
>             Fix For: 4.0
>         Attachments: LUCENE-3878.patch, LUCENE-3878.patch, LUCENE-3878.patch
> In 4.0 livedocs are passed down to the enums, thus deleted docs are not so special.
> So I think checkindex should not pass the livedocs down to the enums when checking,
> it should pass livedocs=null and check all the postings. It already does this separately
> collect stats i think to compare against the term/collection statistics? But we should
> just clean this up and only use one enum.
> For example LUCENE-3876 is a case where we were actually making a corrumpt index,
> (a position was negative) but because the document in question was deleted, CheckIndex

> didn't detect this.
> This could have caused problems if someone just passed null for livedocs (maybe they

> are doing something where its not so important to take deletions into account)

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see:


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message