lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ryan McKinley (Commented) (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3159) Upgrade to Jetty 8
Date Wed, 07 Mar 2012 21:44:57 GMT


Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-3159:

bq. is 8.x just stable enough?

I'm confident the server is stable.  I am not confident we have the most appropriate settings
in solr/example/etc/jetty.xml

These are the same settings we had for jetty 6, but I do not know if this is still the best
choice.  In particular, I'm not sure about the .bio.SocketConnector vs .nio.SelectChannelConnector

Uwe: to backport, we can use the same setup (jetty 8) but need to add in the JSP jar files
and change docs about starting the example.  Unlike the commons-csv issue, I am not concerned
about the patched dependency here because if someone wants to use a different jetty release
they can do it and avoid the JAR hell problems.
> Upgrade to Jetty 8
> ------------------
>                 Key: SOLR-3159
>                 URL:
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: Ryan McKinley
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 4.0
> Solr is currently tested (and bundled) with a patched jetty-6 version.  
> Ideally we can release and test with a standard version.
> Jetty-6 (at codehaus) is just maintenance now.  New development and improvements are
now hosted at eclipse.  Assuming performance is equivalent, I think we should switch to Jetty

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see:


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message