lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "David Smiley (Commented) (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3795) Replace spatial contrib module with LSP's spatial-lucene module
Date Fri, 02 Mar 2012 19:13:58 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3795?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13221174#comment-13221174
] 

David Smiley commented on LUCENE-3795:
--------------------------------------

Everything depends on something.  Lucene depends on Java, and it has no control over Java
except to complain when there are bugs.  This module isn't the first module to have a dependency
and frankly I don't understand the aversion to them -- it's a natural thing.  I agree you
can have too many.

I think Lucene-Spatial's dependency on Spatial4j represents the *best* type of a dependency
that Lucene/Solr could have:
# ASL licensed
# Has code & tests there that aren't related to Lucene; don't clutter or diffuse scope
of Lucene's codebase.
# Strong relationship to Lucene/Solr. Put another way, if Spatial4j were a product, it's only
customer right now is Lucene/Solr.  Consequently:
## When Lucene/Solr decides to release a version, Spatial4J committers will do the same. 
No SNAPSHOT dependency from a Lucene release.
## When a bug or feature request comes up via Lucene that requires changes in Spatial4J, you
(a Lucene committer) can coordinate these changes with great efficiency given that you know
Spatial4J committers.
## You can become a committer on Spatial4j with far less time than it took me to become a
committer here, I swear ;-)  -- _especially_ the spatial-minded folks: Chris (if we had your
GitHub username, you'd be grandfathered in), Uwe, Grant, Yonik?

And because it's a dependency and not 1st-party code, it has a greater opportunity to receive
improvements from outside parties since it's a smaller project with a more focused committer
pool.  This stuff has nothing to do with Lucene, remember.
                
> Replace spatial contrib module with LSP's spatial-lucene module
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-3795
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3795
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: modules/spatial
>            Reporter: David Smiley
>            Assignee: David Smiley
>             Fix For: 4.0
>
>
> I propose that Lucene's spatial contrib module be replaced with the spatial-lucene module
within Lucene Spatial Playground (LSP).  LSP has been in development for approximately 1 year
by David Smiley, Ryan McKinley, and Chris Male and we feel it is ready.  LSP is here: http://code.google.com/p/lucene-spatial-playground/
 and the spatial-lucene module is intuitively in svn/trunk/spatial-lucene/.
> I'll add more comments to prevent the issue description from being too long.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message