lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com>
Subject Re: switch jars to ivy mechanism?
Date Tue, 27 Mar 2012 21:41:02 GMT
+1 to test out Ivy, been thinking about it before as well

--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com

On 27. mars 2012, at 22:59, Robert Muir wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Steven A Rowe <sarowe@syr.edu> wrote:
>> 
>> Agreed.  And also besides plus additionally, Lucene/Solr has way more Ant hackers
than Maven hackers.
>> 
> 
> Believe it or not (you probably won't!) I seriously considered maven
> when looking at how to address the jar dependency issue. Everyone
> knows about my personal opinion on it, but for this issue, I'm trying
> to only look at the least-invasive/least-risk change that solves the
> problem.
> 
> As much as I hate to say it, I initially thought maven was the only
> good alternative, but I took a moment to look at the documentation on
> the ivy site and it seems like a nice solution for our needs: i guess
> i'm hoping we can have a tiny initial non-invasive prototype patch
> that starts attacking the problem iteratively (yeah that means
> initially we still have the crazy xerces situation in lib/ until we
> figure out some solution for that, etc).
> 
> -- 
> lucidimagination.com
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message