lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mikhail Khludnev (Commented) (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3076) Solr should support block joins
Date Tue, 27 Mar 2012 05:47:45 GMT


Mikhail Khludnev commented on SOLR-3076:


It's a great point about a contrast between QPs for query time and index time joins. I haven't
realized it before. Completely agree.

bq. So perhaps it's fine to add crazy-expert syntax that end users would rarely use but search
app developers might...?

That's actually what I'm talking about - start from it. 

Also, I don't assume that this "crazy expert syntax" is a termination stage for the this issue.
We can have a kind of modular approach here: ER-schema module will translate plain set of
filter queries into the BJQ tree expressed in "crazy expert syntax". 
> Solr should support block joins
> -------------------------------
>                 Key: SOLR-3076
>                 URL:
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
>         Attachments: SOLR-3076.patch, SOLR-3076.patch, SOLR-3076.patch, SOLR-3076.patch,
SOLR-3076.patch, bjq-vs-filters-backward-disi.patch, bjq-vs-filters-illegal-state.patch, child-bjqparser.patch,
parent-bjq-qparser.patch, parent-bjq-qparser.patch, solrconf-bjq-erschema-snippet.xml, tochild-bjq-filtered-search-fix.patch
> Lucene has the ability to do block joins, we should add it to Solr.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see:


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message