lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Robert Muir (Commented) (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3159) Upgrade to Jetty 8
Date Wed, 07 Mar 2012 21:10:59 GMT


Robert Muir commented on SOLR-3159:

As far as 3.x, i don't quite understand

What does this mean? does 'experimental' mean like Lucene's FST APIs or does it just mean
its only a few years old :)

Stable/experimental is not absolute and I'm just curious what opinions are.

Obviously jetty7 for 3.x is possibly an option?


Are the unicode bug fixes applied there?
Ryan already did the work for 8.x, 7.x would cost much more man hours...? is 8.x just stable

> Upgrade to Jetty 8
> ------------------
>                 Key: SOLR-3159
>                 URL:
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: Ryan McKinley
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 4.0
> Solr is currently tested (and bundled) with a patched jetty-6 version.  
> Ideally we can release and test with a standard version.
> Jetty-6 (at codehaus) is just maintenance now.  New development and improvements are
now hosted at eclipse.  Assuming performance is equivalent, I think we should switch to Jetty

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see:


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message