Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 149399B61 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 20:57:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65151 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2012 20:57:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 65104 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2012 20:57:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 65097 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2012 20:57:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 20:57:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dawid.weiss@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.176] (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.210.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 20:57:13 +0000 Received: by iagz35 with SMTP id z35so8258044iag.35 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 12:56:52 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of dawid.weiss@gmail.com designates 10.42.188.74 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.42.188.74; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of dawid.weiss@gmail.com designates 10.42.188.74 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=dawid.weiss@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=dawid.weiss@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.42.188.74]) by 10.42.188.74 with SMTP id cz10mr14975105icb.12.1329598612268 (num_hops = 1); Sat, 18 Feb 2012 12:56:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=Xx0QTo3BhAM6GUbMJlgd3G1ISMCYTjN+5iOJdKFqN4Y=; b=GQG2zGh+UoVh48vvGyn+6ovtSo6xJmPy6JBVuozbMVq6ktngun81L3lJFIIlNDPt/K HW5KHTkUqYzzJR3Vu4GfWqgJelPpAHFR+UT9KJLUODXOpMm4pU/xF4I0zZwR5s8Sv7uO WxAvOwLivRQkGCVgrNJPSM4lVTq4R/fv5F3dw= Received: by 10.42.188.74 with SMTP id cz10mr11900430icb.12.1329598612156; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 12:56:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: dawid.weiss@gmail.com Received: by 10.42.167.198 with HTTP; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 12:56:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Dawid Weiss Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 21:56:32 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: gwe2i4uCrBGd18l67DglDizrEi0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [important] Refactoring of tests infrastructure. To: dev@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > I mean "reproducibility bugs" where somehow a test doesn't reproduce > because of bugs in LuceneTestCase :) Oh no -- the whole point of all this is so that we have 100% reproducibility (is there even a word like that?) or failures saying something like: "this random shouldn't be shared and is, fix your test case named: ...". > Right, I think that we can consolidate more obscure stuff (like > testpackageroot), but I was just mentioning i hand-type in -Dtestcase > and also -Dtestmethod quite often when debugging and writing tests. Sure, we can add some shortcuts to avoid typing. Remind me about it if I forget, ok? > Well at some point we have to cut over to this... so I think its > expected we might hit a few snags... but we are probably also fixing a > few bugs we just dont know about in the test infrastructure at the > same time. Yep, that's my guess too. There's this one thing with gson that I don't have a reproducible test case for myself -- once I figure out what this is, I think it'll be ready to land on trunk. Dawid --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org