Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 316B79D5E for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 12:21:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53123 invoked by uid 500); 16 Feb 2012 12:21:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 52925 invoked by uid 500); 16 Feb 2012 12:21:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 52917 invoked by uid 99); 16 Feb 2012 12:21:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 12:21:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 12:21:19 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 926091BAB5A for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 12:20:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 12:20:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Iulius Curt (Commented) (JIRA)" To: dev@lucene.apache.org Message-ID: <466003068.45804.1329394859600.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <14727558.18448.1305620087441.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3109) Rename FieldsConsumer to InvertedFieldsConsumer MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13209305#comment-13209305 ] Iulius Curt commented on LUCENE-3109: ------------------------------------- Is this still valid? (It looks like a good place for me to enter the community) Should also the *FieldsReader/Writer classes that derive FieldsProducer/Consumer become *InvertedFieldsReader/Writer? > Rename FieldsConsumer to InvertedFieldsConsumer > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-3109 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3109 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Task > Components: core/codecs > Affects Versions: 4.0 > Reporter: Simon Willnauer > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 4.0 > > > The name FieldsConsumer is missleading here it really is an InvertedFieldsConsumer and since we are extending codecs to consume non-inverted Fields we should be clear here. Same applies to Fields.java as well as FieldsProducer. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org