lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simon Willnauer <simon.willna...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] New Website
Date Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:35:43 GMT
thanks for all the work grant!

simon

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Paul Doscher
<paul.doscher@lucidimagination.com> wrote:
> Congratulations.. Much nice, cleaner look and feel..
> Thanks
>
> Paul
>
> Paul Doscher
> Chief Executive Officer
> Lucid Imagination, Inc
> 650 353 4057 x 114
> paul.doscher@lucidimagination.com
> www.lucidimagination.com
>
> From: Grant Ingersoll <gsingers@apache.org>
> Reply-To: <dev@lucene.apache.org>
> Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 18:46:08 -0500
>
> To: <dev@lucene.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] New Website
>
> We are now live!
>
> http://lucene.apache.org/
>
>
>
> On Feb 2, 2012, at 6:12 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
> I increased the font size and made it darker.  I also updated the tutorial.
>  Time for me to do other things until this weekend when I'm going to cut
> over, so if you have stuff you don't like before we cut over, see
> instructions below.  This weekend, I will bring in the old versioned docs as
> well as port over the .htaccess stuff and add in redirects for the
> lucene/java stuff to be lucene/core.
>
> If someone could update the news to be current, that would be much
> appreciated.
>
>
> On Feb 1, 2012, at 1:03 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
>
> Ahem! Are we talking "over 40 fonts" here? It's a sad fact that I've
> been noticing
> over the last few years that the screen is getting harder to read... Living
> long
> enough to have that problem beats the alternative though...
>
> Erick
>
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Walter Underwood <wunder@wunderwood.org>
> wrote:
>
> On Feb 1, 2012, at 4:14 AM, Doron Cohen wrote:
>
>
> the text I see (tried 3 browsers) is a bit Gray (or faded), and I rather
>
> read a page with more contrast between the text and the background, more
>
> clear to my eyes this way, but this is just my personal preference, it seems
>
> others do not feel that way, so I'm okay with this.  Hopefully this is more
>
> clear now?
>
>
>
> I agree. The body text is tiny and low contrast. Poor accessibility for
>
> anyone with low vision, including normal aging.
>
>
> Compare to the current site, which isn't large body text by any measure, but
>
> is bigger and full-contrast.
>
>
> Personally, I'd go with a serif font, but that is mostly preference.
>
> Letterforms are more differentiated with serifs, so it is just less work to
>
> read.
>
>
> wunder
>
> --
>
> Walter Underwood
>
> wunder@wunderwood.org
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
> --------------------------------------------
> Grant Ingersoll
> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------
> Grant Ingersoll
> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message