lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Shai Erera (Commented) (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3760) Cleanup DR.getCurrentVersion/DR.getUserData/DR.getIndexCommit().getUserData()
Date Wed, 15 Feb 2012 16:40:59 GMT


Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-3760:

Yes, I know that I can write it. But it means I'll need to write it in every project that
I work on. And so will other people. I really don't get it -- what's the problem with having
such utility method. If we move it to a DirectoryUtils, will that be better? If we move it
to DirectoryReader (on trunk) will that be better?

I don't understand since when we decided to drop API that our users need, because some people
"don't understand the scenario". Is there a technical reason to remove the method? Is it badly
implemented? Is it buggy? Is it hard to maintain?
> Cleanup DR.getCurrentVersion/DR.getUserData/DR.getIndexCommit().getUserData()
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: LUCENE-3760
>                 URL:
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Michael McCandless
>            Assignee: Michael McCandless
>             Fix For: 3.6, 4.0
>         Attachments: LUCENE-3760.patch, LUCENE-3760.patch
> Spinoff from Ryan's dev thread "DR.getCommitUserData() vs DR.getIndexCommit().getUserData()"...
these methods are confusing/dups right now.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see:


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message