lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mark Miller (Commented) (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3622) separate IndexDocValues interface from implementation
Date Fri, 09 Dec 2011 17:23:40 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13166328#comment-13166328
] 

Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-3622:
-------------------------------------

+1
                
> separate IndexDocValues interface from implementation
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-3622
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3622
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: Robert Muir
>         Attachments: LUCENE-3622.patch
>
>
> Currently the o.a.l.index.values contains both the abstract apis and Lucene40's current
implementation.
> I think we should move the implementation underneath Lucene40Codec, leaving only the
abstract apis.
> For example, simpletext might have a different implementation, and we might make a int8
implementation
> underneath preflexcodec to support norms.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message