lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Luca Cavanna (Updated) (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-3586) Choose a specific Directory implementation running the CheckIndex main
Date Mon, 12 Dec 2011 17:07:30 GMT


Luca Cavanna updated LUCENE-3586:

    Attachment: LUCENE-3586.patch

Good eye! Thanks Michael for your feedback.
I attached a new patch version. The merge hasn't been so easy since LTC needs sometimes a
Directory, while other times a FSDirectory. Furthermore commmand line utilities don't need
a fallback while  tests do..before the tests we even create the directory on file system etc.
Let me know what you think!
> Choose a specific Directory implementation running the CheckIndex main
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: LUCENE-3586
>                 URL:
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Luca Cavanna
>            Assignee: Luca Cavanna
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: LUCENE-3586.patch, LUCENE-3586.patch, LUCENE-3586.patch
> It should be possible to choose a specific Directory implementation to use during the
CheckIndex process when we run it from its main.
> What about an additional main parameter?
> In fact, I'm experiencing some problems with MMapDirectory working with a big segment,
and after some failed attempts playing with maxChunkSize, I decided to switch to another FSDirectory
implementation but I needed to do that on my own main.
> Should we also consider to use a FileSwitchDirectory?
> I'm willing to contribute, could you please let me know your thoughts about it?

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see:


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message