Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 18:24:29 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Shai Erera (Commented) (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Message-ID: 
 <848888723.4450.1317925469854.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org>
In-Reply-To: 
 <280387181.4381.1309404208327.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3262) Facet benchmarking
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3262?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13122134#comment-13122134 ] 

Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-3262:
------------------------------------

bq. I think this is ready to commit.

+1. Perhaps just add a CHANGES entry?

bq. but that can go in a separate issue

I think it's better if we resolve it in that issue, and maybe rename the issue to "Facet benchmarking framework". You can still commit the current progress because it is 'whole' - covering the indexing side. I've worked on issues before that had several commits, so this will not be the first one.

We should also run some benchmark tests, describing clearly the data sets, but this can be done under a separate issue.
                
> Facet benchmarking
> ------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-3262
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3262
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: modules/benchmark, modules/facet
>            Reporter: Shai Erera
>            Assignee: Doron Cohen
>         Attachments: CorpusGenerator.java, LUCENE-3262.patch, LUCENE-3262.patch, TestPerformanceHack.java
>
>
> A spin off from LUCENE-3079. We should define few benchmarks for faceting scenarios, so we can evaluate the new faceting module as well as any improvement we'd like to consider in the future (such as cutting over to docvalues, implement FST-based caches etc.).
> Toke attached a preliminary test case to LUCENE-3079, so I'll attach it here as a starting point.
> We've also done some preliminary job for extending Benchmark for faceting, so I'll attach it here as well.
> We should perhaps create a Wiki page where we clearly describe the benchmark scenarios, then include results of 'default settings' and 'optimized settings', or something like that.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org