lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Robert Muir (Updated) (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-3529) creating empty field + empty term leads to invalid index
Date Mon, 24 Oct 2011 21:48:34 GMT


Robert Muir updated LUCENE-3529:

    Attachment: LUCENE-3529.patch

attached is a patch... its basically just a backport of LUCENE-3526 to fix the problem.
> creating empty field + empty term leads to invalid index
> --------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: LUCENE-3529
>                 URL:
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 3.4
>            Reporter: Robert Muir
>         Attachments: LUCENE-3529.patch, LUCENE-3529_test.patch
> Spinoff from LUCENE-3526.
> * if you create new Field("", ""), you get IllegalArgumentException from Field's ctor:
"name and value cannot both be empty"
> * But there are tons of other ways to index an empty term for the empty field (for example
initially make it "garbage" then .setValue(""), or via tokenstream).
> * If you do this, and you have assertions enabled, you will trip an assert (the assert
is fixed in trunk, in LUCENE-3526)
> * But If you don't have assertions enabled, you will create a corrupt index: test: terms,
freq, prox...ERROR [term : docFreq=1 != num docs seen 0 + num docs deleted 0]

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see:


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message