lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Simon Willnauer (Commented) (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3433) Random access non RAM resident IndexDocValues (CSF)
Date Wed, 05 Oct 2011 10:25:34 GMT


Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-3433:

bq. Maybe we should take a look at the bigger picture: perhaps DocValues should really just
a ByteBuffer where offsets are docids, maybe even just using ByteBuffer etc API?

this looks like a very big change to me. you should open an issue and uplaod a patch so we
can see how that looks like for variable bytes etc.

bq. Personally i think the seek() versus advance() is overkill, I think having DISI-like enums
doesn't really make sense for CSF (which is random access by definition), it only
needs get(int) apis.

I figured adding this is a quick win. I'd rather refine the API in a different issue?
> Random access non RAM resident IndexDocValues (CSF)
> ---------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: LUCENE-3433
>                 URL:
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>    Affects Versions: 4.0
>            Reporter: Yonik Seeley
>             Fix For: 4.0
>         Attachments: LUCENE-3433.patch
> There should be a way to get specific IndexDocValues by going through the Directory rather
than loading all of the values into memory.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see:


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message