Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 02:29:27 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Robert Muir (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Message-ID: 
 <712550733.43998.1313548167532.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org>
In-Reply-To: 
 <49890047.22178.1312167674277.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org>
Subject: [jira] [Reopened] (LUCENE-3354) Extend FieldCache architecture to
 multiple Values
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Robert Muir reopened LUCENE-3354:
---------------------------------


reopening: there is a problem in the test

> Extend FieldCache architecture to multiple Values
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-3354
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3354
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Bill Bell
>             Fix For: 4.0
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-3354.patch, LUCENE-3354.patch
>
>
> I would consider this a bug. It appears lots of people are working around this limitation, 
> why don't we just change the underlying data structures to natively support multiValued fields in the FieldCache architecture?
> Then functions() will work properly, and we can do things like easily geodist() on a multiValued field.
> Thoughts?

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org