Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 21:44:48 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Michael McCandless (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Message-ID: <551374886.156.1312235088514.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org>
In-Reply-To: 
 <222300428.16010.1311873429902.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3348) IndexWriter applies wrong deletes
 during concurrent flush-all
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13073804#comment-13073804 ] 

Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3348:
--------------------------------------------

OK I attached output of a failure -- it's 400K lines.  Search for the AssertionError, where id:26 couldn't find a doc nor tombstone.

> IndexWriter applies wrong deletes during concurrent flush-all
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-3348
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3348
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: core/index
>            Reporter: Michael McCandless
>            Assignee: Michael McCandless
>             Fix For: 3.4, 4.0
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-3348.patch, LUCENE-3348.patch, LUCENE-3348.patch, fail.txt.bz2
>
>
> Yonik uncovered this with the TestRealTimeGet test: if a flush-all is
> underway, it is possible for an incoming update to pick a DWPT that is
> stale, ie, not yet pulled/marked for flushing, yet the DW has cutover
> to a new deletes queue.  If this happens, and the deleted term was
> also updated in one of the non-stale DWPTs, then the wrong document is
> deleted and the test fails by detecting the wrong value.
> There's a 2nd failure mode that I haven't figured out yet, whereby 2
> docs are returned when searching by id (there should only ever be 1
> doc since the test uses updateDocument which is atomic wrt
> commit/reopen).
> Yonik verified the test passes pre-DWPT, so my guess is (but I
> have yet to verify) this test also passes on 3.x.  I'll backport
> the test to 3.x to be sure.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org