lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From eks dev <>
Subject Re: new AutomatonQuery(RunAutomaton) ?
Date Wed, 31 Aug 2011 20:32:48 GMT
bytes are good, I am in byte range on this data, and "even simpler" is good :)

It is simple, I just need to know if  this automaton I used for
AutomatonQuery accepts one stored field, so yes it is the same
information as in Term, but I need to run over it once more because my
query is not filtering on AutomatonQuery

((AutomatonQuery(A)) OR (OtherQuery) )+

So I get back documents not matched by this Automaton and I do not
know which ones are there due to the "OtherQuery"

running search in 2 passes, with and without automaton  is not practicable

On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Robert Muir <> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 2:37 PM, eks dev <> wrote:
>> Keeping AutomatonQuery around came to me as an option, but do not
>> forget, I need Automaton (RunAutomaton) for post processing... There
>> is no way to get Automaton back from the AutomatonQuery?
> The compiled automaton is not always a RunAutomaton, sometimes its
> internal representation is something even simpler :)
> Additionally, when it is a RunAutomaton, its a UTF-8 one, for
> operating directly on bytes...
> Can you describe a little bit about what 'post processing' you need to
> do? I imagine its post processing on something other than the terms?
> --
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message