lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael McCandless <>
Subject Re: Separate issue for appendable field caches / doc values
Date Mon, 22 Aug 2011 22:48:48 GMT
Separate issue would make sense I think?

But, we are trying to move FC under IR control (Martijn has a patch),
at which point an RT IR could have its own appending impl...?

But then... FC still returns fixed arrays so you can't append until we fix that?

Mike McCandless

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Jason Rutherglen
<> wrote:
> LUCENE-2312 needs appendable field caches.  I can include this
> functionality into LUCENE-2312, or separate it out into a separate
> issue / patch.
> However it would only be useful for RT / LUCENE-2312.  Also, I'm not
> sure how this functionality relates to doc values.  If we used doc
> values, then we would not be able to port LUCENE-2312 to Lucene 3.x.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message