Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 18:26:09 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Yonik Seeley (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Message-ID: 
 <795212545.21061.1312050369538.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org>
In-Reply-To: 
 <1879255020.19751.1311970330801.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org>
Subject: [jira] [Updated] (SOLR-2685) always use SolrInputDocument
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-2685:
-------------------------------

    Attachment: SOLR-2685.patch

Here's a patch that implements the above, in addition to moving from String to BytesRef for getIndexedId() and some other misc cleanups.

> always use SolrInputDocument
> ----------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-2685
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2685
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Yonik Seeley
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: SOLR-2685.patch
>
>
> First, there was only Document, then AddUpdateCommand added support for SolrInputDocument, and most document producers create SolrInputDocuments.  But AddUpdateCommand continues to support both, leading to confusion and more work for update processors (which should they look at? both?).  It seems like we should remove "Document" from AddUpdateCommand for the sake of consistency.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org