lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Uwe Schindler (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3318) Sketch out highlighting based on term positions / position iterators
Date Sun, 24 Jul 2011 16:54:09 GMT


Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3318:

bq. Also - I did run a quick test to check, and it seems that the existing HL may throw a
TooManyClauses in the same situation we would here. Perhaps HL consumers expect this? I think
I agree that it would be more friendly to catch internally, though - can the consumer recover
in any other way? I don't think so.

With standard highlighter the query is executed against a MemoryIndex with only this one document.
Its unlikely to fail, but it can for very large docs (of course).

> Sketch out highlighting based on term positions / position iterators
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: LUCENE-3318
>                 URL:
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: modules/highlighter
>    Affects Versions: Positions Branch
>            Reporter: Simon Willnauer
>            Assignee: Mike Sokolov
>             Fix For: Positions Branch
>         Attachments: LUCENE-3318.patch
> Spinn off from LUCENE-2878. Since we have positions on a large number of queries already
in the branch is worth looking at highlighting as a real consumer of the API. A prototype
is already committed.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see:


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message