lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Uwe Schindler (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3314) TestNumericRangeQuery test failure
Date Thu, 14 Jul 2011 15:57:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3314?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13065344#comment-13065344
] 

Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3314:
---------------------------------------

I just wanted to make clear, that this test in 3.x was always supported and "did the right
thing"(tm). In my opinion, we can change the semantics in trunk and simply remove that additional
assert in the test. On the other hand, I would prefer to throw IllegalStateEx after you call
next() too often (like ju.Iterators do).

> TestNumericRangeQuery test failure
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-3314
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3314
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 4.0
>            Reporter: Robert Muir
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/G-L/view/Lucene/job/Lucene-trunk/1624/testReport/org.apache.lucene.search/TestNumericRangeQuery32/testEnum/
> ant test -Dtestcase=TestNumericRangeQuery32 -Dtestmethod=testEnum -Dtests.seed=-3603272894684698645:-1998239306864854687
-Dtests.multiplier=3 -Dtests.nightly=true

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message