Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 19BA24A89 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:53:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11180 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 17:53:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 11130 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 17:53:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 11123 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 17:53:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:53:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rcmuir@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:52:57 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so239281bwz.35 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 10:52:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fLpeGkmP/z7uxF7CjwPfROOiMtxW5SZz6Xv5BvPXWEo=; b=J/q9SuZh19YAAxUksDvrfqqmSQEYGynyPW2el3aepbA/iXHmoXPBkD0qRsaofj4uHJ HK2uzr9wjsfP1aJxr1m2M9mXH/FFCskt4uRwF+GE+MCPX4h3B8GzCSMdD08621JEIhu0 IeTDavt5Cyw2yGA95laxM4QqYjpTgaTonW5TI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=mIFrDeUrOXJOEQT7pmvD94oam9rugQ4okn1TuZ5iE1x+RGElnwPsAoTp9+MkFyTRzS x+xRIS5dqQkk3bCn9cJbMUWlON2HLHdW5gdCEPWviv8HfO0vImVDmPbrrmBTCtPsf72z XiPCWp2PscOoRK4Ec2i3r8TaKUaezkStud3NY= Received: by 10.204.33.138 with SMTP id h10mr1776648bkd.159.1308678757111; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 10:52:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.84.138 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 10:52:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <2D127F11DC79714E9B6A43AC9458147FC2EFD099@suex07-mbx-03.ad.syr.edu> References: <2D127F11DC79714E9B6A43AC9458147FC2EFD097@suex07-mbx-03.ad.syr.edu> <2D127F11DC79714E9B6A43AC9458147FC2EFD099@suex07-mbx-03.ad.syr.edu> From: Robert Muir Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:52:17 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: managing CHANGES.txt? To: dev@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Steven A Rowe wrote: > On 6/21/2011 at 1:26 PM, Robert Muir wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Steven A Rowe wrote: >> > Is the CHANGES.txt policy you advocate (and police) written up in one >> > place? =C2=A0I'm sure you'd like to not have to fix up everybody's ent= ries.... >> >> It wasn't anything i advocate, I'm just describing what it seems like >> we do 99% of the time? (in my example, Uwe committed it, and I didnt >> fix anything) > > I'm confused - seems like you're disavowing the role you've been playing = as CHANGES policeman - yet I've seen at least 10 CHANGES-policing commits w= ithin the last six weeks?: > I do disavow this role: when CHANGES.txt is jacked up, i fix it, I don't complain to anyone about it. I dont understand how this makes me a policeman? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org