Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0046B65D6 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 06:52:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 59313 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 06:52:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 58769 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 06:52:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 58762 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 06:52:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 06:52:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dawid.weiss@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.48] (HELO mail-yw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.213.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 06:52:15 +0000 Received: by ywn13 with SMTP id 13so1561011ywn.35 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:51:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=HTiRrAW7FqvPasfirp1woJDHsikHfDCVg1LNX36lNv4=; b=cbICOLJYRcG57VzcRsOL+PRraOxQ0SRd34nFnhioJ52uM4hXHH7lq96O1CViwJNYA5 BIR/pwu17wF1c69wYiLy2zA1JpXYabhu1aQreLYO3ZVddqttL5riNuE1LrHjHieGX0wP UOnxDe4lALXxV3t9xjTmtgIPBfStx6zji0pNw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=jXYStzzmxkcNsxCxGTYxJIcGMfEiD2tDgWo6UBuuCbq1NBQL5k/8T+W74xK1OzPwSO EfImf/67iBCWqv+gVQuJPJuw8lqSIs451g9FvtW/uiUTZ7pR5DQMo+yWMCP4rhjAwdEt VJJxvdh06tQpIWbzox4yn6w1xDO3UrP8j/2W0= Received: by 10.90.132.6 with SMTP id f6mr1021021agd.56.1308898313111; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:51:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: dawid.weiss@gmail.com Received: by 10.90.109.2 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:51:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <2D127F11DC79714E9B6A43AC9458147FC2EFD196@suex07-mbx-03.ad.syr.edu> References: <2D127F11DC79714E9B6A43AC9458147FC2EFD196@suex07-mbx-03.ad.syr.edu> From: Dawid Weiss Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 08:51:33 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: PJLErpjMKyuUEHlrInBbtoRRvHU Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] release 3.3 To: dev@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I checked the clustering contrib, went through the Solr example (on ubuntu). One thing I noticed: - we have duplicated log4j*.jar in the distribution; the one in clustering contrib is not needed, in fact, because we use slf4j for logging anyway (and this one is picked from the war's WEB-INF/lib. I'll file an issue to remove it. Dawid On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Steven A Rowe wrote: > +1 > > I did the following: > > - compared the Solr & Lucene binary .zip and .tgz archives' contents for = any differences (other than line endings) > - skimmed Changes.html for generation problems > - looked at random pages from each module's javadocs > - ran the Lucene demo, indexed and searched > - ran the Solr example server, indexed and searched > - eyeballed all modules' Maven artifacts & sanity checked their POMs > - ran all tests from the Solr & Lucene source tarballs, separately > > Two non-release-blocking nits: > > 1. In the Solr source tarball, solr/example/README.txt recommends using t= he command "./post.sh *.xml" from solr/example/exampledocs/, but post.sh do= es not have executable permissions. =C2=A0In the binary tarball, however, p= ost.sh has executable permissions. > > 2. I checked the source for references to older versions, and I found the= following; I think these just point to a missing item in the release todo = (post-branching), and should not block the release: > > ./lucene/contrib/analyzers/common/src/java/org/apache/lucene/analysis/fr/= FrenchStemFilter.java: @Deprecated // TODO remove in 3.2 (this is present t= wice in this file) > > ./lucene/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/ConcurrentMergeScheduler.java: = =C2=A0/** @deprecated remove all this test mode code in lucene 3.2! */ > > ./lucene/contrib/analyzers/common/src/java/org/apache/lucene/analysis/br/= BrazilianAnalyzer.java: =C2=A0// TODO make this private in 3.1 (this is pre= sent twice in this file) > > ./lucene/contrib/demo/src/java/org/apache/lucene/demo/IndexFiles.java:/**= Index all text files under a directory. See http://lucene.apache.org/java/= 3_1/demo.html. */ > > ./lucene/contrib/demo/src/java/org/apache/lucene/demo/IndexFiles.java: + = "See http://lucene.apache.org/java/3_1/demo.html for details."; > > Steve > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcmuir@gmail.com] >> Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2011 4:18 PM >> To: dev@lucene.apache.org >> Subject: [VOTE] release 3.3 >> >> Artifacts here: >> >> http://s.apache.org/lusolr33rc0 >> >> working release notes here: >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote33 >> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote33 >> >> I ran the automated release test script in >> trunk/dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py, and ran 'ant test' at the >> top level 50 times on windows. >> Here is my +1 > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org