Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1E2776CF2 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:34:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9673 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 15:34:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 9608 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 15:34:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 9601 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 15:34:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:34:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rcmuir@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:34:06 +0000 Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so4078567bwz.35 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 08:33:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4w/DN5TBaLyb84qd/EkQPGxEHsBL3HTx8VIskhxU/jg=; b=H+Lxv+sVRFDo8WSvv8AVWYEJDPsECSWSUwgTZEsQV07dYfyzaKX8H2Q30mJ+bRPVbN 4XWWWIiCZ6L78cnXFd6hf9b5hXc+2qdA2ygFhjEUW+Q/Sr8BFrWn7vuJH0NdOYlNYnqL mIID25u6F8sKNVKGHPto5W8x0QKr1k1F4Xh3k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=NTrJUiifd8tfm8rzJhAJIYAmRHHuj/N5c4eif0cw2u46MHoGQqcx/yg+V8v+vM8ZII G58RfTx983VYWnfg9CzOeYg2Wnr8cNhdLb4YTuyBofK9ho2jmmU6dQC9P9txbsI9IfQF HxKuFFiZnfZBQslhtfreUZEWhLoQTHHXcf+JA= Received: by 10.205.82.67 with SMTP id ab3mr2060446bkc.166.1308929626097; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 08:33:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.57.83 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 08:33:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <009701cc3283$f1d897b0$d589c710$@thetaphi.de> References: <008a01cc327d$1b223830$5166a890$@thetaphi.de> <009401cc327d$5d4ab660$17e02320$@thetaphi.de> <009501cc327e$943cea70$bcb6bf50$@thetaphi.de> <009601cc3282$4264eeb0$c72ecc10$@thetaphi.de> <009701cc3283$f1d897b0$d589c710$@thetaphi.de> From: Robert Muir Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 11:33:26 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] release 3.3 To: dev@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org And -Xint and -client On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote: > The bug is *not* fixed by replacing Long.numberOfLeadingZeros(word) with = BitUtils.nlz(word). > > So this is really strange. Also happens with -Xbatch. > > ----- > Uwe Schindler > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > http://www.thetaphi.de > eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:uwe@thetaphi.de] >> Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 5:20 PM >> To: dev@lucene.apache.org >> Subject: RE: [VOTE] release 3.3 >> >> I assume the problem is the intrinsic, I will replace by the own hacker'= s >> delight impl (like we do everywhere else in OpenBitSet, why did we use t= he >> platform method here?) and try again.... >> >> Uwe >> >> ----- >> Uwe Schindler >> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen >> http://www.thetaphi.de >> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de >> >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcmuir@gmail.com] >> > Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 5:07 PM >> > To: dev@lucene.apache.org >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] release 3.3 >> > >> > Just some more info: i took away the seed and used -Dtests.iter=3D100 = on >> > this >> > test: >> > >> > JAVA5: >> > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 [junit] Testsuite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestOpenBitSet >> > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 [junit] Tests run: 400, Failures: 0, Errors: 23, Time el= apsed: >> > 21.793 sec >> > >> > JAVA6: >> > junit-sequential: >> > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 [junit] Testsuite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestOpenBitSet >> > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 [junit] Tests run: 400, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time ela= psed: >> > 19.719 sec >> > >> > so this test fails 23% of the time on java5. >> > >> > The reason we never caught it, is that java5 is unmaintained and we >> > cannot even test it in hudson... aka we cannot support this monster >> anymore!!!! >> > >> > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Robert Muir wrote= : >> > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Uwe Schindler >> > wrote: >> > >> The OpenBitSet test is in all cases serious (vs. the skiplist test >> > >> is a test bug, >> > that true). >> > >> >> > >> The AIOOBE is caused inside OpenBitSet and that should never ever >> > happen, even if you use it incorrectly! >> > > >> > > Its not clear that its that serious, it only fails with java 5 for >> > > me (not java 6) :) >> > > >> > > Looks like a bug in java 5... >> > > >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For >> > additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional >> commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org