Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BC0456359 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 00:30:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 61494 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 00:30:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 61329 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2011 00:30:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 61322 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2011 00:30:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 00:30:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yseeley@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 00:30:11 +0000 Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so756166fxm.35 for ; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 17:29:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=qDdxG/812T6jpx6fDgzhwupJBIC4+K+BTI3+Z92eQHA=; b=LX9ZWbpcOpGDI8XlTs0oQ5kRTdOYupdKe2guWkTi8k+f0WN6DqZXsA4IwFJ3kTPWCu CXRjlbsEECjBWPxjLRG+THoOaHjxzpVqhgGH4/xkZ72v2z7bfSJKk7L+ZUaWiQjhSDg7 9bCxGMOwVMVpiYXfA9Fn+GBvqAtrZKtonUiHs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=cv/mGHtksvCVoPfX3GlDj7EOGsj5GtI7RQAg+PWhlSthOSOoVrt7ciLGIsxHQwUl4S 4qQiRumhKBRyWmMaeDX7kwlec2C5QiWFbWYPC0W/mCs6kesrQeJW0XcPPdwdm0ACJB4i 08jZprHGx7IRwNapI2usvOdABwBTh1YZYKZuc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.23.143 with SMTP id r15mr117807fab.29.1306974589411; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 17:29:49 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: yonik@lucidimagination.com Sender: yseeley@gmail.com Received: by 10.223.2.208 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 17:29:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 20:29:49 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: E7jQDdcRgquIDFNLJKQJDdKKEEY Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Lucene/Solr release 3.2 (take 2) From: Yonik Seeley To: dev@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Andi Vajda wrote: > +1 > > I checked out Lucene sources from the lucene_solr_3_2 branch, built PyLucene > from them and all tests passed. > > Thank you for having fixed the bug that prevented a lucene-only checkout > from building (LUCENE-3160, I believe) ! Errrr, hopefully you won't have expectations of "lucene-only" in the future. There has been a lot of work lately to refactor parts of solr code to the shared modules space (i.e. it's both lucene and solr). It's also the case that it's step-by-step - for example code may be refactored to "modules" but some/much of the test code may still temporarily be under "solr". It's one project now... -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org