Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:48:47 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Robert Muir (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Message-ID: 
 <825168309.6534.1308138527416.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org>
In-Reply-To: 
 <949922371.6458.1308136367381.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3205) remove MultiTermQuery
 get/inc/clear totalNumberOfTerms
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049734#comment-13049734 ] 

Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3205:
-------------------------------------

yes, please do?

> remove MultiTermQuery get/inc/clear totalNumberOfTerms
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-3205
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3205
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Robert Muir
>             Fix For: 3.3, 4.0
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-3205.patch
>
>
> This method is not correct if the index has more than one segment.
> Its also not thread safe, and it means calling query.rewrite() modifies
> the original query. 
> All of these things add up to confusion, I think we should remove this 
> from multitermquery, the only thing that "uses" it is the NRQ tests, which 
> conditionalizes all the asserts anyway.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org