lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Rutherglen <jason.rutherg...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Distributed search capability
Date Fri, 10 Jun 2011 00:03:48 GMT
> Yes, and rightfully so - it didn't handle properly some query types, so you
> would actually get wrong results.

That's bad!

> "roll your own (and contribute it back!)" if you are more advanced ;)

Wouldn't "roll your own" basically mean resurrecting the previous
implementation of MultiSearcher?  Ie, what would be different?

On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Andrzej Bialecki <ab@getopt.org> wrote:
> On 6/10/11 12:10 AM, Jason Rutherglen wrote:
>>
>> Right, if that's not around, one needs to use multi searcher, that's
>> gone too?
>
> Yes, and rightfully so - it didn't handle properly some query types, so you
> would actually get wrong results.
>
> For now the answer is "use Solr" if you are less advanced, or "roll your own
> (and contribute it back!)" if you are more advanced ;)
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Andrzej Bialecki     <><
>  ___. ___ ___ ___ _ _   __________________________________
> [__ || __|__/|__||\/|  Information Retrieval, Semantic Web
> ___|||__||  \|  ||  |  Embedded Unix, System Integration
> http://www.sigram.com  Contact: info at sigram dot com
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message