lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Rutherglen <jason.rutherg...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Distributed search capability
Date Fri, 10 Jun 2011 16:25:16 GMT
> its fine to have some higher-level class to support this crap, but it
> shouldnt be some transparent searcher.

I'll create a patch and post to a Jira.

On a side note, for multi threaded calls I noticed there's a lock on
the PQ in IndexSearcher, is the performance of that OK?

On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 9:21 AM, Robert Muir <rcmuir@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Jason Rutherglen
> <jason.rutherglen@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I think we only need to resurrect the merge score/field-docs code, in
>> it's own class.  Eg, each sub-node is expected to create it's own
>> score/field-docs, then the merge code is centralized.
>>
>>> Maybe we should bring back the 'merge results' part of multi searcher
>>> without the query rewrite.
>>
>> This is how Solr works today.
>>
>
> no its not, the problem with multisearcher was it was too low of a level.
>
> its fine to have some higher-level class to support this crap, but it
> shouldnt be some transparent searcher.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message