lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Rutherglen <jason.rutherg...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Distributed search capability
Date Fri, 10 Jun 2011 16:18:32 GMT
I think we only need to resurrect the merge score/field-docs code, in
it's own class.  Eg, each sub-node is expected to create it's own
score/field-docs, then the merge code is centralized.

> Maybe we should bring back the 'merge results' part of multi searcher
> without the query rewrite.

This is how Solr works today.

On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Robert Muir <rcmuir@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Jason Rutherglen
> <jason.rutherglen@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Maybe we should bring back the 'merge results' part of multi searcher
>> without the query rewrite.
>>
>
> and how exactly? If this was easy, we wouldn't have to do
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2837
>
> I looked at this stupid multisearcher problem for way too much time
> myself and I totally agreed the only proper bugfix was the "nuclear"
> option (ridding of multisearcher entirely).
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message