lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] release 3.3
Date Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:33:26 GMT
And -Xint and -client

On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de> wrote:
> The bug is *not* fixed by replacing Long.numberOfLeadingZeros(word) with BitUtils.nlz(word).
>
> So this is really strange. Also happens with -Xbatch.
>
> -----
> Uwe Schindler
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:uwe@thetaphi.de]
>> Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 5:20 PM
>> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] release 3.3
>>
>> I assume the problem is the intrinsic, I will replace by the own hacker's
>> delight impl (like we do everywhere else in OpenBitSet, why did we use the
>> platform method here?) and try again....
>>
>> Uwe
>>
>> -----
>> Uwe Schindler
>> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>> http://www.thetaphi.de
>> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>>
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcmuir@gmail.com]
>> > Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 5:07 PM
>> > To: dev@lucene.apache.org
>> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] release 3.3
>> >
>> > Just some more info: i took away the seed and used -Dtests.iter=100 on
>> > this
>> > test:
>> >
>> > JAVA5:
>> >     [junit] Testsuite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestOpenBitSet
>> >     [junit] Tests run: 400, Failures: 0, Errors: 23, Time elapsed:
>> > 21.793 sec
>> >
>> > JAVA6:
>> > junit-sequential:
>> >     [junit] Testsuite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestOpenBitSet
>> >     [junit] Tests run: 400, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed:
>> > 19.719 sec
>> >
>> > so this test fails 23% of the time on java5.
>> >
>> > The reason we never caught it, is that java5 is unmaintained and we
>> > cannot even test it in hudson... aka we cannot support this monster
>> anymore!!!!
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Robert Muir <rcmuir@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de>
>> > wrote:
>> > >> The OpenBitSet test is in all cases serious (vs. the skiplist test
>> > >> is a test bug,
>> > that true).
>> > >>
>> > >> The AIOOBE is caused inside OpenBitSet and that should never ever
>> > happen, even if you use it incorrectly!
>> > >
>> > > Its not clear that its that serious, it only fails with java 5 for
>> > > me (not java 6) :)
>> > >
>> > > Looks like a bug in java 5...
>> > >
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For
>> > additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org For additional
>> commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message