lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mike Sokolov (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-1889) FastVectorHighlighter: support for additional queries
Date Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:21:47 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1889?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13055599#comment-13055599
] 

Mike Sokolov commented on LUCENE-1889:
--------------------------------------

Ah, I see - that's awesome, thanks, had no idea.  Yeah - I had been thinking about matching
positions->offsets using the existing term vectors, which was going to be kind of unpleasant;
you have to iterate by term, which you don't care about, and scan for a matching position.

> FastVectorHighlighter: support for additional queries
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1889
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1889
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Wish
>          Components: modules/highlighter
>            Reporter: Robert Muir
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: LUCENE-1889.patch
>
>
> I am using fastvectorhighlighter for some strange languages and it is working well! 
> One thing i noticed immediately is that many query types are not highlighted (multitermquery,
multiphrasequery, etc)
> Here is one thing Michael M posted in the original ticket:
> {quote}
> I think a nice [eventual] model would be if we could simply re-run the
> scorer on the single document (using InstantiatedIndex maybe, or
> simply some sort of wrapper on the term vectors which are already a
> mini-inverted-index for a single doc), but extend the scorer API to
> tell us the exact term occurrences that participated in a match (which
> I don't think is exposed today).
> {quote}
> Due to strange requirements I am using something similar to this (but specialized to
our case).
> I am doing strange things like forcing multitermqueries to rewrite into boolean queries
so they will be highlighted,
> and flattening multiphrasequeries into boolean or'ed phrasequeries.
> I do not think these things would be 'fast', but i had a few ideas that might help:
> * looking at contrib/highlighter, you can support FilteredQuery in flatten() by calling
getQuery() right?
> * maybe as a last resort, try Query.extractTerms() ?

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message