lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Vinicius Barros (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-1768) NumericRange support for new query parser
Date Fri, 10 Jun 2011 23:56:59 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047788#comment-13047788
] 

Vinicius Barros commented on LUCENE-1768:
-----------------------------------------

Hi Uwe,

Thanks for reviewing the patch again. I will fix the problems you mentioned.

I do not think the code is ready to be committed, I am just sending the patches so you can
keep track of my progress. I hope to have something useable soon, then you can commit, probably
before the end of gsoc.

> NumericRange support for new query parser
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1768
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1768
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: core/queryparser
>    Affects Versions: 2.9
>            Reporter: Uwe Schindler
>            Assignee: Adriano Crestani
>              Labels: contrib, gsoc, gsoc2011, lucene-gsoc-11, mentor
>             Fix For: 4.0
>
>         Attachments: week1.patch, week2.patch
>
>
> It would be good to specify some type of "schema" for the query parser in future, to
automatically create NumericRangeQuery for different numeric types? It would then be possible
to index a numeric value (double,float,long,int) using NumericField and then the query parser
knows, which type of field this is and so it correctly creates a NumericRangeQuery for strings
like "[1.567..*]" or "(1.787..19.5]".
> There is currently no way to extract if a field is numeric from the index, so the user
will have to configure the FieldConfig objects in the ConfigHandler. But if this is done,
it will not be that difficult to implement the rest.
> The only difference between the current handling of RangeQuery is then the instantiation
of the correct Query type and conversion of the entered numeric values (simple Number.valueOf(...)
cast of the user entered numbers). Evenerything else is identical, NumericRangeQuery also
supports the MTQ rewrite modes (as it is a MTQ).
> Another thing is a change in Date semantics. There are some strange flags in the current
parser that tells it how to handle dates.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org


Mime
View raw message